When your candidate can tote up 60% of the vote in an election, you have to think you've got a good candidate. When your candidate totes up 60% against a jailed felon, a local perennial candidate, a nobody, and a collection of nobodies you have to wonder how viable he's going to be running against a real opponent.
Not to worry, an explanation has been found.
And you'll never guess what it is.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Well, I think there is another dynamic hindering my support of President Obama.
He had no experience, while a US Senator he didn't work on anything, and no one worked with him. And as President I abhor and fear his agenda, and lament his lack of competence, and the irresponsible way that the Democratic party and Congress let him get away, time after time, with disrespect for the law.
It's one of those elections that come along every so often in which neither candidate has any experience at the office.
After four years, I think that Obama knows less about being President than before '09. Certainly, his performance indicates he's not merely a slow learner but not a learner at all.
Post a Comment