I think I read that California's experience with draconian term limits was less that appealing.
Apparently the (union?) bureaucrats, not the elected officials, now accumulate the seniority, and garner the meaningful relationships. And the bureaucrats set the agendas. Since the office holders come and go, the staid and senior bureaucrats pose a tough obstacle to change. Or representing non-union interests, either.
So someone opposed to term limits might be a scab.
1 comment:
I think I read that California's experience with draconian term limits was less that appealing.
Apparently the (union?) bureaucrats, not the elected officials, now accumulate the seniority, and garner the meaningful relationships. And the bureaucrats set the agendas. Since the office holders come and go, the staid and senior bureaucrats pose a tough obstacle to change. Or representing non-union interests, either.
So someone opposed to term limits might be a scab.
Post a Comment