tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8472211903033725545.post926315540307767857..comments2024-01-12T12:52:08.097-07:00Comments on Billlls Idle Mind: Gun LawsBillllhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13913354887560267235noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8472211903033725545.post-4244236762711739482009-02-19T06:49:00.000-07:002009-02-19T06:49:00.000-07:00"The right to vote is also abridged in many places...<I>"The right to vote is also abridged in many places for the same reasons as the right to arms. It is interesting to consider how the case would sound if voting were substituted for gun possession."</I><BR/><BR/>See <A HREF="http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/021985/" REL="nofollow">Glenn Reynolds, July 22, 2008</A>:<BR/><BR/>I’ve written about this subject — the promiscuous creation of trivial felonies — in the <A HREF="http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=031605B" REL="nofollow">past</A>. I also would argue, though, that you shouldn’t restore felons’ right to vote unless you’re willing to restore all their rights, including the right to possess arms. Citizenship should be a package deal. ANOTHER UPDATE: I see that others have made a <A HREF="http://volokh.com/posts/1143873304.shtml#78378" REL="nofollow">similar point</A>."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com